User talk:Ashendant

You should apply for admin rights, you certainly deserve them. It would make your job much easier. -- Аsuryan's (talk) 10:31, 16 May 2016 (MDT)

I probably should, the website being this empty of users it would feel a bit pointless.--Ashendant (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2016 (MDT)

Frontpage links updated. Also the strange thing is that the WFB pages have been seeing a huge spike in visitors since the SEGA videogame Warhammer:Total War shipped. But as with all wikis, only the tiniest fraction of new readers wish to contribute.

re. message

Hey, got your message. Wanna hit the points you bring up:

• I do know how to use the Fn/Endn system and I've been sourcing most of the stuff I add, I sometimes forget to when I go down a long rabbit-hole of edits. My plan is to put up all the Realms info I can find from the primer and the first Realmgate Wars book and make sure it's all sourced before getting too far into the other books and faction battletomes. I want to hit it all eventually - Realms, factions, armies, characters, etc.
• I'll keep in mind the [[ ]] thing, I generally don't like linking to non-existent articles until I'm ready to write them, but I don't mind that much.
• I actually prefer summarizing info rather than copying directly, I just noticed directly copied text elsewhere and did the same. I'd rather use my own words anyway so I'll do that from now on.

I'm really hoping to get this wiki up to snuff as a reference for Age of Sigmar info. Thanks. GoldenYak (talk) 11:24, 10 August 2016 (MDT)

Hey Ashendant,

I suggest a new page for Age of Sigmar (game). That will give us a page to link to when we are talking about the GW game itself, as opposed to the setting. There are some stubs for warhammer fantasy and some of its editions that we can use as a template for now. Eventually we will want our publication/ game apges to feel more like the 40K ones that have cover pics, table of contents, publication date, etc... Bigred (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2017 (MDT)